Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 1 - 20 of 5,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2008, 1:43 pm
The Supreme Court decided today by a 5-4 vote in the D.C. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Term, 3rd Dept., decided 1/15/2009)Although bears may not bear hug, people sometimes do. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
  Although most people believe the right was already there, it really was not according to many lower court cases over the years because of the reference to the militia:  A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.The Supreme Court finally answered the question, in a 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:21 am by Adam Wagner
One significant argument against such a policy is that it is potentially discriminatory against people who cannot afford housing. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 11:30 am
Even if the teddy bear is mailed using a fake name and return address. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:52 am
I understand that people have a Second Amendment right to bear firearms. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:58 pm
Bear demonstrate that the value of the property taken (since the plea was for grand theft) to be less than $950.But the petition doesn't do so. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm by Christine Bechtold
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
  Habituated--These bears are accustomed to being around people and have learned not to fear them. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:38 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
According to DFW, the following significant accomplishments obtained since the 2015 CBBMP was approved include: DFW presented educational programs to nearly 15,000 people in 19 counties. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:30 am by Angela Banks
” Yet, the Court has simultaneously held that noncitizens are not part of “the people” guaranteed a right to bear arms. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Torres, No. 15-10492, involving these two provisions: "[T]he right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]