Search for: "People v. Bell (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
The Supreme Court has issued an opinion in BELL ATLANTIC CORP. et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
  In May, 2010, wedding food also hospitalized at least one hundred people in Northern India. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
  On 12 November 2010, MGN made an offer of amends under s. 2 of the Defamation Act 1996 and offered to publish an apology. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
’ Third, in considering whether the claim should be struck out under section 8 of the 1996 Act, Master Bell concluded on the same bases that the proceedings had no realistic prospect of success and met the test for summary disposal. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The recently published Removal of bells from a closed church considers two judgments relating to St James, Church Kirk in the Blackburn Diocese; the earlier case, Re St James Church Kirk [2019] ECC Bla 4, suggested that the designation of “church treasure” was not appropriate in relation to one of the church’s bells [12, 13]. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419.… [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
In both types of cases, the social landlord is pursuing proceedings in order to recover property that might be used to provide accommodation for other homeless people. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
The source of this specter lies not in anyone's crystal ball but in the history of U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:18 am by Eric Alexander
Coll., 77 F.3d 364, 366 (11th  Cir. 1996), and Magluta v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am by Jeff Welty
In that case, a Taco Bell employee spit in a trooper’s food, and the trooper sued. [read post]