Search for: "People v. Bennett"
Results 21 - 40
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Those email addresses were used by the people who had posted the reviews to register with Trustpilot. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Kiwi Farms has had a well-documented history of sparking campaigns of doxing, often targeting LBGTQ+ people. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:02 pm
In Forbes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
In 2017, in Matal v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
GB News fired host Laurence Fox after more than 8,800 people complained to Ofcom about derogatory remarks he made about a female journalist, Ava Evans. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
” The defendant reviewed the records of 145 people between 17 January and 17 October 2019 “without having a business need to do so. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 8:33 am
Some recent exciting challenges include R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin), Uduezue v Bexley LBC (2023) EWCA Civ 322, and R (Cort) v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On Friday 21 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm
People infected with norovirus usually recover in two to three days without serious or long-term health effects. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
As the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, notes, Utah v. [read post]
