Search for: "People v. Bernard" Results 81 - 100 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 5:07 am by Joe Palazzolo
U.S. (11-199) and Reichle v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:55 pm
Parts IV and V address another aspect of universality and particularity about which natural law theory needs to get clear: how the moral norms of natural law, properly as universal as human nature and the community of all people and peoples, nonetheless warrant strong loyalty to specific communities, above all one's country and one's marital family. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:25 am
To download a copy of the AD1’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Carr,” http://landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/10/Baker-V-Carr Bernard Grofman, Voting Rights, Voting Wrongs: The Legacy of Baker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Frankly, I am not sure there is a right answer to the question rather reasonably and informed people of good faith, certainly such people whom I respect of that nature, can hold diametrically opposed opinions. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And, perhaps most importantly, he reminds us that the people we condemn are in fact people. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
George Bernard Shaw offered both wisdom and a cautionary tale when he said that "[c]ustom will reconcile people to any atrocity.... [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 4:29 pm by Jan Morrison
  As a result of conflicting opinions in the lower courts, the matter was brought to the California Supreme Court in Bernard v Foley (2006) 39 C4th 794, 47 CR3d 248. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Playwright George Bernard Shaw was not stretching the truth when he gave one of his characters these words: “Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell kicks off a series of posts on PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]