Search for: "People v. Bernstein (1987)" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 4:46 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Last week, Eugene blogged about the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am by David Bernstein
[Bernstein: In fact, this calumny has its roots in Soviet antisemitic propaganda.] [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sweeney & Cohn. supra, at p. 835 citing People v Edney, 39 NY2d 620 (1976); Cornell v Bernstein-Macaulay.Inc., 407 F.Supp. 420 (SDNY 1976); Heam v Rhay, 68 FRD 574 (ED Wash 1975); see also Deutsche Bank Trust Co. of Americas v Tri-Links Inv. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
Interestingly, it is this last work—counselling “firm rule over people”—which grounds the insurgent common good constitutionalism, the New Right’s substantive legal theory. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Oct. 5, 2015) (Bernstein, J.), and Op. sur Appellate Issues (Phila. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Supp. 740, 783 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (noting that confounding had not been sufficiently addressed in a study of U.S. servicemen exposed to Agent Orange), aff’d, 818 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1987). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]