Search for: "People v. Berry" Results 121 - 140 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 2:48 pm
The tale of Janine Sugawara, the woman who sued the manufacturer of "Cap'n Crunch with Crunch Berries" for allegedly misleading her about the "berries," has turned out to be extremely popular, bringing literally tens of thousands of people to this site over the past few days.Unfortunately, one of them was her lawyer.He thought I had been unfair to his client and asked me to clarify that she had not alleged that she personally believed… [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
[AmLaw Daily] * Judicial reform advocates are doing happy dances in response to the SCOTUS ruling in Caperton v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:43 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Free With Registration: Counsel Not Ineffective for Failing to Advise Client, Adamantly Claiming Innocence, to Plead Guilty Berry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:14 pm
  The consequence of this mathematics means that the purveyor of the tuna does not have warn consumers that the tuna violates Prop 65.The state didn't like that outcome and filed suit against the purveyor, in a case entitled People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Every year, Wimbledon runs for a period of two weeks and employs people in various jobs. [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:03 am
  The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
  As a matter of constitutional interpretation, Hoke v U.S., 227 U.S. 308 (1913) seemed to suggest that Congress had the power to block movement of people across state lines for any purpose whatsoever. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 12:11 am
Christine Berry and Corey StanleyRICHMOND COUNTYTortsHospital, Employees Not Liable for Plaintiff's Injury For Acts of Privately Retained Attending PhysicianVaccaro v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
The Schwab case represents the latest showdown over whether pending executions should be postponed until after the Supreme Court has heard and decided the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]