Search for: "People v. Best" Results 201 - 220 of 13,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
  Even when the People think that a trial best serves the interest of justice, isn't it a permissible role for a neutral judge to say, no, you're undervaluing the benefits of informal resolution. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:40 pm
I'm not cursing you or violent or get at you personal, but I'm saying what is the best interest of me. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 pm
 It orders her released from Patton and tells CONREP to find (and let the court know) the best outpatient placement for her. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
  I'm not sure that devoting several hours (or even a day or two) to what's perhaps his best (only?) [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:54 pm
Taking a relatively boring issue, Maj Rick Belliss did his best to spice it up. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
And New York law, as interpreted by People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:59 am by admin
Well, the Arizona Court of Appeals answered that question in the case of Jorgenson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:40 pm by Ron Coleman
People who looked at this item also looked at… Best of 2011: Sun, Oracle, Microsoft, Google, trademark, patents, copyright and David Boies Fat lady sings: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in Designer Skin v S & L Vitamins [...] [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
  We haven’t conducted complete research, but we think that Rodriguez is probably the best Pain pump decision to date. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
Best leave that at home before we all start seeing "colour" everywhere and breaking every afternoon for tea. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm
  Which isn't necessarily the case.Regardless:  It's still not the San Bernardino County Public Defender's best day. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
Under his theory, “where decision-making by courts is concerned, precedent is the best guide to constrained discretion of judges, to hold the legal system stable, to let people order their affairs. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
In other words, it's the most clever people who are best at dressing up their emotional and partisan beliefs in high-minded reasoning, the best at cherry-picking the evidence to support their cause, the best at poking holes in any contrary evidence. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:42 pm
Sidoti, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the judge's taking account of other people's discriminatory motives amounted to unlawful race discrimination on his part.The principle of Palmore v. [read post]