Search for: "People v. Best"
Results 321 - 340
of 12,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 1:47 am
It's official - Florida v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 10:05 am
Here is the abstract.Moody v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:56 pm
In this interesting article, EQ Predicts A Lawyer's Success Better Than IQ, Lexi Herrera (from The Complete Lawyer, V.2, issue 5) argues that while law firms will always hire those with the best academic credentials, EQ - or emotional intelligence - may be a far better predictor of ultimate success. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:39 pm
In Rhinehart v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
Creative people will create no matter what. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
We can best understand Katz as moving the focus of “searches” from property to privacy. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
The violation was technical at best because, while the other people were awakened by the police arriving too early in the morning, the defendant was not one of them, and his interests were not involved or protected by the nighttime search rule. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:54 am
Despite all of this and despite the presumed lens through which Wypijewski walked into the courtroom in the trial of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:25 pm
That could have helped the defendant in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
Sometimes people get footnote-happy when they write opinions. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:44 pm
Justice Edelmann, in West Vancouver (District), v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
The best biography is still Charles Page Smith’s James Wilson: Founding Father, 1742-1798, a dull, plodding account published in 1956. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
We posted briefly last Monday (January 9) on the oral argument that morning in Sackett v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Their position was analogous to that of the claimant in Burnip v Birmingham City Council, who herself required overnight care. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 am
I guess that only few people doubt this today. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
People v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
