Search for: "People v. Best" Results 101 - 120 of 13,654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The chief target of these efforts lately has been the author of the decision that overturned Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
In 2018, a BC judge awarded $1 over a review that—at best—was only mildly defamatory. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
In its course correction, Singleton observes that its indictment jurisprudence has been “inconsistent at best. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am by Peter A. Mahler
I would guess most people hearing that would think a judge hearing the dissolution case wouldn’t hesitate to grant the petition and appoint a receiver to wind down and liquidate the business. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
HUS is a frightening complication that even in the best American centers has a notable mortality rate.[56] Among survivors, at least 5 percent will suffer end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the resultant need for dialysis or transplantation.[57] But, “[b]ecause renal failure can progress slowly over decades, the eventual incidence of ESRD cannot yet be determined. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
Donors are under no obligation to devote their resources to their highest and best use. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:59 am by Ilya Somin
In his book, Bryan suggests that a Supreme Court decision striking down exclusionary zoning would have to overturn Village of Euclid v. [read post]