Search for: "People v. Block"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
Randall Kentucky Governor Can Block Constituents on Social Media–Morgan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
” For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/knight-first-amendment-institute-v-trump For information about the lawsuit:https://knightcolumbia.org/content/knight-institute-v-trump-lawsuit-challenging-president-trumps-blocking-critics-twitter Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am
The post Another Blocked Facebook User Loses in Court–Dipp-Paz v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
Doubly ironic that Reisch blocked people in response to her own tweet questioning her opponent’s patriotism because her opponent supposedly showed insufficient respect for the flag during the pledge of allegiance at a local event. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:47 am
Related posts: Blocking Constituents from Facebook Page Violates First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am
The space where people interact and comment are therefore not government speech. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:58 pm
This case is analogous to a Tenth Circuit decision from January finding no state action in blocking people from an account started during an initial campaign and... [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
To be clear, I’d say that about any government official who advanced their job using their social media account yet blocked people from that account. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:04 am
So to get the best of both worlds, he decided to block certain people from his Twitter feed -- people who criticized him, of course -- allowing him to tweet to his heart's content without these critics being able to respond.And this being 21st Century America, he was sued for doing this. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:02 pm
In Forbes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
Summum and Walker v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:31 pm
A Missouri judge Monday temporarily blocked an emergency rule that would have required people seeking gender-affirming care to first receive over a year of therapy among other prerequisites. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
What is more, the record shows that the Trustees hid or deleted negative comments from the Garniers that were not repetitive but did not similarly hide or delete positive comments from other people. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
The fact that it’s even close here reflects the perniciousness of the hiQ v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:09 am
See Rosenberger v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:43 pm
Wade with Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:51 am
Garnier and Lindke v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:20 am
In the end, the best way to try to ascertain the effect of ISP blocking orders is to ask the people who are engaged in the practice. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:31 am
Honolulu, and Shell Oil v. [read post]
