Search for: "People v. Booth"
Results 1 - 20
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2018, 3:50 pm
To figure out what the defendant's sentence was, all you need to know are the offenses for which he was convicted:"Defendant was convicted of five counts of sexual penetration of a child 10 years old or younger; 1 three counts of oral copulation of a child 10 years old or younger; five counts of preparing pornographic images of a minor; one count of possessing child pornography; and one count of sexual exploitation of a child. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Choy, People v Hawkins and People v White. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
In this case, the protester loses.The case is Higginbotham v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:40 am
In Saieg v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 2:30 am
On December 18, 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in Katz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:42 pm
Sidoti, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the judge's taking account of other people's discriminatory motives amounted to unlawful race discrimination on his part.The principle of Palmore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am
Monday was the 50th Anniversary of Katz v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
New York v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Booth, No. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what Booth v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:19 pm
” See: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:44 am
The brief was filed in State v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:23 am
(Of course, it’s not like reading vague and legalistic privacy policies actually gives most people that much usable information about what companies do with their data anyway!) [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:56 am
People have likely spoken about it as a great way to alternatively resolve seemingly intractable personal problems. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
And on the constitutional front, the focus in US v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:07 pm
[1] Lopez Torres v. [read post]
