Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 201 - 220 of 3,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The use of purpose and context are debated, as one would expect, but it is nonetheless uncontroversial that statutory context can include relevant international law instruments and soft law and may extend to the values underpinning the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the constitutional imperative of reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am by Mark Tushnet
My guess is that in discussions about whether to create a plural executive you’d find the same assumption at work, with people saying that distinctions among those people would have to be made expressly in the Constitution or adopted by the executives themselves. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:16 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  The executive branch has no authority to invent new crimes. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
Lobbying the executive branch, for example, is not considered lobbying for tax purposes and so is not subject to the lobbying limits. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
For many people, various aspects of their job may necessitate working more than 40 hours per week, so it is important to understand your overtime pay entitlement. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
For many people, various aspects of their job may necessitate working more than 40 hours per week, so it is important to understand your overtime pay entitlement. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
Special Counsel Jack Smith has concluded that he can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that several private lawyers acted as co-conspirators in former President Donald Trump’s criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]