Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
This case is a victory for people needing to sue an insurance company and its adjusters. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The Swiss branch of the Movement itself was lawfully registered in Switzerland. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 10:15 am
Related Cases: American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
The individual claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status has the burden of demonstrating that he or she enjoys such status [see People v Hayes, 135 AD 19]; and2. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" This principle, "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government, requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
I would rather judges apply the law as they see it and save the sound bites for the elected branches. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:49 pm
One of the many ways EFF is fighting illegal NSA spying is in our lawsuit First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
19 Apr 2025, 4:33 pm
In the wake of J.G.G. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
The notion that the judiciary may supervise the political decisions of the two other branches was rejected as early as Chief Justice John Marshall’s landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Here is the abstract: In McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Jarkesy, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
Cervini v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:54 pm
See Teter v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
At one level, the evident conduct of the Chief Justice's fellow Republican appointees is very immature and suggests that the Supreme Court functions in a manner that better resembles the interactions of a dysfunctional family than those of the people who head the judicial branch of the United States government. [read post]
