Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 21 - 40 of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:48 am by Mark Graber
Conservatives who claim to hate Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
Challenging conventional legal analysis and arguing instead that constitutional politics won the day, he describes the complex interactions among branches of government—and also between government and the ordinary people who participated in the struggle. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Lead poisoning expert witness Joseph Courtney testified in The People of California v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:07 am by SHG
The Supreme Court that decided Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Branch, 46 N.Y.2d at 650–651, 415 N.Y.S.2d 985, 389 N.E.2d 467; People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
"On August 7, 2008, Rasmussen entered a Bank of America branch in Arcata. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 7:25 am by Rick Hasen
This authority is conveyed through written constitutions that charter the government, vest power in different branches, and… Continue reading [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
People are talking about Judge Easterbrook's opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Baez-Sanchez v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
Yet as the AG becomes “the People’s lawyer” instead of general counsel for the state’s executive branch, the people will turn to the AG instead of groups like the Sierra Club to litigate for tangible changes in regulatory policy. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is the law that is written down by the legislative branch of government. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Kagan
What Justice Kavanaugh’s majority opinion does instead is hold that courts cannot order the Executive Branch to arrest and prosecute more people. [read post]