Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 21 - 40 of 3,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
Challenging conventional legal analysis and arguing instead that constitutional politics won the day, he describes the complex interactions among branches of government—and also between government and the ordinary people who participated in the struggle. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:45 pm
Perhaps the same people are giving legal advice to both of them. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:15 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Prison Litigation Reform Act gives various people, including state legislators, standing to challenge such orders. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Lead poisoning expert witness Joseph Courtney testified in The People of California v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:07 am by SHG
The Supreme Court that decided Brown v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Branch, 46 N.Y.2d at 650–651, 415 N.Y.S.2d 985, 389 N.E.2d 467; People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:29 am
 Seems the California Supreme Court thinks so, too, and so under Briggs and Van de Kamp v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
"On August 7, 2008, Rasmussen entered a Bank of America branch in Arcata. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
People are talking about Judge Easterbrook's opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Baez-Sanchez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
 Nor, as in Printz, is there any question of separation of powers: the mandate will be enforced by the Executive Branch, and the people will know it. [read post]