Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 41 - 60 of 3,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
 Nor, as in Printz, is there any question of separation of powers: the mandate will be enforced by the Executive Branch, and the people will know it. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
Yet as the AG becomes “the People’s lawyer” instead of general counsel for the state’s executive branch, the people will turn to the AG instead of groups like the Sierra Club to litigate for tangible changes in regulatory policy. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Kagan
What Justice Kavanaugh’s majority opinion does instead is hold that courts cannot order the Executive Branch to arrest and prosecute more people. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is the law that is written down by the legislative branch of government. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:23 am by Ted Frank
But in terms of executive-branch regulatory policy, he has been one of the more sensible people on the left side of the aisle. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
 The People of the State of California agree, and support the trial court's view of the statute on appeal.But the Court of Appeal disagrees. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:32 am by John Diekman
The defendants failed to demonstrate that there was no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead rational people to the conclusion reached by the jury based on the evidence presented at trial, pursuant to CPLR 4404[a].The Appellate Division also affirmed denial of that branch of the motion which was to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of liability as contrary to the weight of the evidence. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 12 January 2017, the Court of Human Rights handed down judgment in the case of Lykin v Ukraine ([2017] ECHR 17), providing a timely reminder that freedom of political expression under Article 10 can trump reputation. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
That’s what the legislative branch exists to do. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 9:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
” Unlike public officials, members of the judicial branch “do not speak for the people, but we speak for the Constitution. [read post]
The Court’s deference to the political branches in matters of public health and safety was later put on display in Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
That taxonomy may have influenced the Supreme Court’s analysis of patents in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 1:48 pm by davidferriero
This year, in recognition of Taylor Branch’s groundbreaking research on the Civil Rights Movement, we presented two facsimiles of a document that he sought under a 1986 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the FBI, Branch v. [read post]