Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
From the Supreme Court in NCAA v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:50 am
Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP), where we both have worked, continues to provide technical assistance in other states where legislators and executive branch officials are interested in strengthening these laws. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:06 pm
Kerik (2d Cir. 2004) and People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
My favorite illustration of this comes in New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:42 am
From Bierly v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 9:28 am
Circuit published an interesting standing opinion last week: Citizens for Constitutional Integrity v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am
On May 20, the Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC), Karim Khan, applied to a Pre-Trial Chamber of the court for the issuance of arrest warrants against three Hamas leaders and against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
14 Sep 2024, 8:30 am
Supreme Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:52 am
” But indispensable actors in this process have been executive branch lawyers. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 8:52 am
In Avilez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:00 am
Supreme Court in support of the unsuccessful petition for certiorari in Edgar v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 11:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:57 am
And those people have a plan. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 7:40 pm
United States, to Seila Law v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm
The Department of Homeland Security, too, has focused its surveillance authorities on political and other constitutionally-protected speech, as well as activities far outside its homeland security mandate, including those of: journalists, racial justice demonstrators in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, and people simply reacting online to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
Another ruling in the PNC v. [read post]
