Search for: "People v. Brannon" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:14 am by David Kopel
Panelists: Reva Siegel & Joseph Blocher, Nelson Lund, Brannon Denning, and Jake Charles. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Randy Barnett, Bob Cottrol, Brannon Denning, Michael O’Shea, and Glenn Harlan Reynolds, as well as the Firearms Policy Foundation, urging the Ninth Circuit to oppose en banc review of the case. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:24 am by Michael Crowell
The Supreme Court dodged the constitutional issue in Brannon v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was ruled in People v Brannon that in order to forcibly stop and detain a person, a police officer must have "reasonable suspicion that such person has committed, is committing or is about to commit a crime. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
Correia,First Assistant Wayne County Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on two consolidated cases (People v Brannon and People v Fernandez (2011 NY Slip Op 03676, _ NY3d _ [5/11/11) which set forth the level of knowledge a police officer must possess before, consistent with DeBour, he or she has reasonable suspicion to believe an individual possesses a gravity knife as opposed to a legal pocketknife.In People… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:31 am by SHG
This comes from the Tennessee Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]