Search for: "People v. Bridgman" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
In determining whether or not the court would grant the hardship license, the court put much weight into People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Researchers have revealed the specific harms and disproportionate negative impacts surveillance and algorithmic tools can have on disabled people in education, the legal system, health care and the workplace. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
” Private hearing and anonymity The Judge emphasised that the information in this case plainly concerns sexual activity between two people, taking place in private. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
We had a case comment by Persephone Bridgman Baker Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 (QB) (Nicklin J). [read post]