Search for: "People v. Bright (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm by Graham Smith
  He likened Google to the owner of a wall on which people chose to inscribe graffiti, for which the owner was not responsible. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Dave
In our shiny bright new year, DCLG is consulting on a new version of the Allocations Code of Guidance following the enactment of the Localism Act 2011, which has made several seemingly minor substantive alterations to Part 6, Housing Act 1996 (although those alterations are hugely significant practically). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Dave
In our shiny bright new year, DCLG is consulting on a new version of the Allocations Code of Guidance following the enactment of the Localism Act 2011, which has made several seemingly minor substantive alterations to Part 6, Housing Act 1996 (although those alterations are hugely significant practically). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:23 am by Bill Easton
  Recognizing this burden, and the unfairness of foisting it on an unwilling defendant, the Court of Appeals has repeatedly reversed cases where an affirmative defense was imposed on an unwilling defendant (see e.g., People v Bradley, 88 NY2d 901, 902 [1996] [extreme emotional disturbance]; People v DeGina, 72 NY2d 768, 776-777 [1988] [entrapment]).New York Affirmative DefensesNew York Penal Law Article 40 groups the general affirmative defenses that… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:28 pm by Ray Dowd
Document Servs., Inc., 99 F.3d 1381, 1392 (6th Cir. 1996) (quoting Time Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kevin Russell
Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), the Court found that states could take property from “innocent owners”—people who had done nothing wrong—if the government could show by a preponderance of the evidence that the property was involved in a crime. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:35 am by Paul J. Feldman
” The FCC announces three “bright line” net neutrality rules. [read post]