Search for: "People v. Brown (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2006, 4:47 am
People are very excited about the Supreme Court's opinion in Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
”  And yet as White points out in his post, the Supreme Court in Tennessee v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:31 am
Supreme Court's recent prison overcrowding case of Brown v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 10:35 am by David Ettinger
  So holds the Supreme Court today in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Carol Corrigan in People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
(1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 218, 226-228, 220 Cal.Rptr. 712 [civil penalty under Civ.Code, § 1794]; Marshall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the protection of person and property.” 253 Mich at 541. [read post]