Search for: "People v. Brown (1988)"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
Section 3-805(b)(2) prohibits or deters a broad range of speech about people’s daily lives. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Blake Brown Canadian State Trials, Vol. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 55 (1988) (citation omitted). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” Brown, 947 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Saxe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
The Gridiron Battle In 2009, legendary Cleveland Browns football player Jim Brown sued Electronic Arts and Sony, claiming they had violated the Lanham Act by including his image and stats in EA’s Madden Football series. [25] EA had licensed current NFL players through the NFL Players Association, but as an NLF retiree, Brown was not included. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
According to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Brown, to violate the Lanham Act there must be no artistic relevance to the underlying work whatsoever, or in the event there is, the use must be explicitly misleading. [27]Maximum’s Nearly Identical ArgumentCMG echoes Brown’s argument with regard to the Lanham Act, alleging that Maximum’s use of General Patton is causing consumer confusion as to any involvement and endorsement. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
As Justice Scalia explained in what proved to be a prescient dissent in the 1988 case of Morrison v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
Manuel Noriega raises his fists to acknowledge the crowd cheers during a Dignity Batallion rally in Panama City on May 20, 1988. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Most people recall Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Brown, Elaine. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
” Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
While it is rare for the Court to overrule a past decision that had recognized an individual right or limited state power—it is more common, as in Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
But in Boyle v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
See Brown, 356 U.S. at 154, 78 S.Ct. 622; see also Presser v. [read post]
