Search for: "People v. Brown (1988)" Results 101 - 120 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
"People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Sidney Poitier is a determined Thurgood Marshall in this dramatization of the events leading up the Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: In 1989, while he was chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Thomas published a law review article based on remarks delivered at a 1988 Federalist Society event. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
While it is rare for the Court to overrule a past decision that had recognized an individual right or limited state power—it is more common, as in Brown v. [read post]
As regards the integration of American society which civil rights leaders fought and died to achieve, reports from organizations document how a great deal of the progress won since the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court's decision to deny Kindred Nursing Centers' motion to dismiss Teresa Brown's negligence claims or compel arbitration.The contract is unenforceable absent evidence that Brown had legal authority to act on behalf. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
” Justice Kennedy was nominated by President Reagan and took his oath of office on February 18, 1988. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]