Search for: "People v. Brown (1988)" Results 101 - 120 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  The police are paid to arrest people. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
* The IPKat thanks Daniel Gallagher (Mayer Brown International LLP) for picking up a small but significant error in the original version of this post. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Grade: D Super Bowl XXIII 1988 Another bad logo. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:57 am by Mary Whisner
Ct. 1805) (ownership of a hunted fox)Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 When pasteurization started to become more mainstream early last century, some people were suspicious of the technology. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am by INFORRM
In the Lord Browne case (Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2007) the judge agreed with Associated that knowing that there was a relationship between Lord Browne and Jeff Chevalier was ‘important background in authenticating in readers’ minds the other allegations they [the newspaper] wish to publish’ which were considered to be in the public interest. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
The appellants accordingly applied for compensation under the statutory scheme established by the CJA 1988. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
The Morris worm of November 1988 had already foreshadowed the Internet's coming loss of innocence, but it is interesting to note that the ordinary legal system found a way to deal with the MIT student who accidentally unleashed the first widely-deployed Internet pest. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court's decision to deny Kindred Nursing Centers' motion to dismiss Teresa Brown's negligence claims or compel arbitration.The contract is unenforceable absent evidence that Brown had legal authority to act on behalf. [read post]