Search for: "People v. Brown (1988)" Results 101 - 120 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
The appellants accordingly applied for compensation under the statutory scheme established by the CJA 1988. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
The Morris worm of November 1988 had already foreshadowed the Internet's coming loss of innocence, but it is interesting to note that the ordinary legal system found a way to deal with the MIT student who accidentally unleashed the first widely-deployed Internet pest. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court's decision to deny Kindred Nursing Centers' motion to dismiss Teresa Brown's negligence claims or compel arbitration.The contract is unenforceable absent evidence that Brown had legal authority to act on behalf. [read post]
As regards the integration of American society which civil rights leaders fought and died to achieve, reports from organizations document how a great deal of the progress won since the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
  Hence Illinois unquestionably had jurisdiction over [petitioner]'s petition.[22] Furthermore, the court can still rule on grounds for dissolution of marriage even if the petitioner has not satisfied the 90-day residency requirement.[23] In Hermann v Hermann, 219 Ill [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
  Drawing from a concurring opinion by Justice Whiteside in the 1988 case of State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Scope of Liability             In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm by Daniel Brown
”‘A mysterious kid'Mackel Peterkin was born on a rainy night in Scarborough in the fall of 1988. [read post]