Search for: "People v. Buckley" Results 1 - 20 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
 Some may recall that Judge Buckley was the lead plaintiff challenging federal regulation of campaign finance in Buckley v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
I myself am more open to campaign contribution limits than he (or his former boss, Justice Thomas) is; I explain my thinking briefly in this article, which shows me to be one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm by crush
Third, the Court somewhat ominously notes, “This case does not involve any challenge to the base limits, which we have previously upheld [in Buckley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:28 am by Rick Hasen
  Floyd said no—individuals could always spend as much as they wanted on elections since Buckley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:17 am by Burt Neuborne
 The box has four walls built by the Justices in Buckley v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
(Buckley also illustrates this conflict by having his Justices constantly including Latin phrases in their opinions and even in their casual conversation.)Of course, Buckley wants us to think, a criminal should not be able to sue a gun maker for his gun's failure; any idiot can see that, just as any idiot can see that people who smoke should be responsible for the damage it does to them (a point, albeit not the only point, of the libertarian Buckley's… [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
That's from his new book "Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir," and it refers to his experience immediately upon his ascent to the Supreme Court in 1976, when the Justices were deciding Buckley v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]