Search for: "People v. Bull" Results 1 - 20 of 861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2019, 8:54 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
An exception was made for pit bulls when the Maryland Court of Appeals considered a pit bull attack in the 2012 case of Tracey v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:10 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Winners in New Bill People who decry breed discrimination against pit bulls because the law would eradicate the distinction. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:22 am by Ted Brooks
 About the author: Ted Brooks' noteworthy trial experience includes People v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:12 am by Greenberg & Bederman
There are probably thousands of people who own pit bulls that have never hurt a fly. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm by Roy Black
The Bull Dog tortured poor Oscar for an intense five days. [read post]