Search for: "People v. Burchell"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2011, 12:45 am
There is a three stage test laid down by the case of British Home Stores v Burchell EAT 1980 ICR 303, which is this; At the time the employee was dismissed, did the employer believe the employee had been guilty of misconduct? [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
That was a that Mr Stuart Burchell, also naming himself the managing agent in the employ of ABC, having prepared the witness statement for the 7 August 2020 hearing. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
People have, for example, ‘imaginary friends’, but they rarely have ‘imaginaries’ (Brigitte Nerlich, Imagining imaginaries, University of Nottingham Blog (23 April 2015) with a nice summary explanation of the evolution and expansion of the term within the social sciences)Whatever its pedigree, the term is useful here. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
