Search for: "People v. Bury (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
In fairness to the judge, his neglect of this point may have been due to the fact that the federal government gave it short shrift in their brief (allocating less than two pages to it buried in the middle of a fifty page brief). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
(See Footnote 2) o Clauses that would not only send people to arbitration but would also re-write the laws, so that the statutes of limitations would be changed to the point that individuals would have to bring their claims within a few months of having been wronged, even where the laws normally applicable to their claims would give them several years to bring their claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
  The victim’s family and community bury him/her, thinking that he/she is dead. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]