Search for: "People v. Bush (1978)"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
The bulk of the review remains highly classified. ...The inspectors general from the Departments of Justice and Defense, as well as the CIA, the NSA and the office of the Director of National Intelligence, said they reviewed thousands of documents and interviewed more than 200 people in connection with the report, including Bush era officials John Negroponte, who served as director of national intelligence, National Security Agency Director Michael V. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 7:22 pm
Revolutionary changes in technology have occurred since FISA was enacted in 1978, and those changes have resulted in FISA--contrary to the intent of Congress in 1978--often requiring the government to get a court order to collect information on foreign terrorists and other foreign targets located overseas. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:14 pm
In March 2015, the Supreme Court decided Young v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:05 pm
Bush v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:56 am
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:21 am
Since 1978, when the current death penalty system was adopted by California voters, over 900 people have been sentenced to death for their crimes. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Bush chose David Souter instead.) [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
After you graduated high school in 1978, you departed for bucolic Cambridge, MA, where you graduated with honors and joined Phi Beta Kappa. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:04 pm
Revolutionary changes in technology have occurred since FISA was enacted in 1978, and those changes have resulted in FISA--contrary to the intent of Congress in 1978--often requiring the government to get a court order to collect information on foreign terrorists and other foreign targets located overseas. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 and Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Lizza discusses Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Tyler, 436 U.S. 499, 509 (1978) (citing Warden v.Hayden, 387 U.S. 294, 298-99 (1967)). [3] Katz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
Bush. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
People talk of Chevron deference as though it were binary (deference or no deference), but in practice it is not so monolithic. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Spiegel missed out with 26% of the vote.In the General Election, in November of 2000, (can you say Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
Cabranes put in a 1978 article in Foreign Policy. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
