Search for: "People v. Bustamante"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 3:33 pm
This essay therefore considers the proper boundaries of procedural autonomy in litigation, using the recent decision in Delaware Coalition for Open Government v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:38 am
"A lot of people have painted immigrants as the criminal element in our society, and that isn't the case," said Bustamante, Northern California director of Strengthening Our Lives, a statewide nonprofit group that works to empower immigrants. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
We help injured people all around Smith County. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
We help injured people all around Smith County. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:29 am
The California Supreme Court in People v Bustamante (1981) 30 C3d 88, 99 n7, overruled on other grounds in People v Johnson (1992) 3 C4th 1183, 1222, supports this choice: At most, defense counsel is merely present at the lineup to silently observe and to later recall his observations for purposes of cross-examination or to act in the capcity of a witness. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:29 am
The California Supreme Court in People v Bustamante (1981) 30 C3d 88, 99 n7, overruled on other grounds in People v Johnson (1992) 3 C4th 1183, 1222, supports this choice: At most, defense counsel is merely present at the lineup to silently observe and to later recall his observations for purposes of cross-examination or to act in the capcity of a witness. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:44 pm
People v. [read post]
