Search for: "People v. Bustamante" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
The California Supreme Court in People v Bustamante (1981) 30 C3d 88, 99 n7, overruled on other grounds in People v Johnson (1992) 3 C4th 1183, 1222, supports this choice: At most, defense counsel is merely present at the lineup to silently observe and to later recall his observations for purposes of cross-examination or to act in the capcity of a witness. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:29 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
The California Supreme Court in People v Bustamante (1981) 30 C3d 88, 99 n7, overruled on other grounds in People v Johnson (1992) 3 C4th 1183, 1222, supports this choice: At most, defense counsel is merely present at the lineup to silently observe and to later recall his observations for purposes of cross-examination or to act in the capcity of a witness. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:33 pm by Beth Graham
This essay therefore considers the proper boundaries of procedural autonomy in litigation, using the recent decision in Delaware Coalition for Open Government v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:38 am
"A lot of people have painted immigrants as the criminal element in our society, and that isn't the case," said Bustamante, Northern California director of Strengthening Our Lives, a statewide nonprofit group that works to empower immigrants. [read post]