Search for: "People v. Cain"
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2016, 4:25 pm
In Weary v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:25 pm
In Weary v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:25 pm
In Weary v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
” Coverage of Wearry v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Cain 14-10008Issue: (1) Whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Cain. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Cain, 14-10008 (presenting questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel); and Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Lynch, 15-362, is for all you CAT People out there. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
Cain, 14-10008, a capital case out of Louisiana, is our third fourth relist. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Cain, 14-10008, a capital case out of Louisiana, landed its third relist as well. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Cain, 14-10008, a capital case out of Louisiana, has been rescheduled, had its record requested, and has now been relisted – twice. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Cain 14-10008Issue: (1) Whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Cain, 14-10008, is a capital case out of Louisiana that the Court has already rescheduled once and called for the record in. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
Florida (summarized here) and Brumfield v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
Florida (summarized here) and Brumfield v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
