Search for: "People v. Campbell (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
In December 1981, Lynn Goldsmith, a professional freelance photographer, took a number of photographs of Prince (then 23 years old) on assignment for Newsweek, both in concert and in her studio in New York. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by Thomas James
Acuff-Rose Music The “transformative use” saga really begins with the 1994 case, Campbell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by Thomas James
Acuff-Rose Music The “transformative use” saga really begins with the 1994 case, Campbell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Like the 1981 SFST study, both laboratory and field observations were made. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by Christina Sonsire
Goldfarb, 425 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1981); Hartford Accident & Indem. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The Kyiv Post was successful in a “libel tourism” case brought by businessman Dimitry Firtash in respect of a story downloaded by 21 people in England. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Clause 21 would amend s.10 of the Contempt of Court 1981 to provide, in relation to “journalistic sources” (see cl.37(1) & Sch.5, para.1(3) to the Bill), that before requiring a person to disclose, or finding a person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the identity of a journalistic source, the court would have to be satisfied not only that such disclosure was necessary in the interests of justice or national security or for the prevention of crime or… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
It states: “Article 7. (1) All powers in the Republic belong to the people, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution(2) This Constitution is, as the solemn expression of the will of the people, the supreme law of the Republic, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void. [read post]