Search for: "People v. Canales" Results 1 - 20 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
(Canales, Maritza) (2nd—B329138) Employment Relationships—Joint Employment—WCAB, denying reconsideration, affirmed WCJ’s finding that applicant suffered cumulative injury ending 7/20/2020, while jointly employed as housekeeper/nanny by ophthalmological surgical clinic East West Eye Institute (eventually… Walt Disney Travel Company, The v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:13 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
 – Canal + not successful: no LOC (BoA annulled) T-368/22 (07/06/23) – Bankia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am by INFORRM
” Decisions this Week European Court of Human RightsC8 (Canal 8) v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax Disputes & Investigations team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd [2023] UKSC 17, which was handed down on 17 May 2023. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am by David Cole
In our democracy, Madison argued, “[t]he people, not the government, possess the absolute sovereignty,” and the people must be free to criticize those who govern them. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  This conflict involved proposals to assert federal power to construct roads, canals, and other infrastructure of arguable benefit to the nation. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
The Cubans and the US prefer the optics of remittances as a strategic weapon--the Americans to show from time to time their resolve against Cuban human rights abuses and their generosity to help the Cuban people; the Cubans because it is possible to mask the extent of the tax on these remittances and their laundering within the internal economy. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
County of Placer (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 63 (discussed on the blog here: https://www.ceqadevelopments.com/2022/02/23/third-district-addresses-significant-ceqa-issues-in-mixed-decision-on-placer-countys-eir-for-specific-plan-rezoning-allowing-development-of-martis-valley-timberlands/), Save the El Dorado Canal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  People came rushing in to buy land, and an era started to pass. [read post]