Search for: "People v. Cardenas"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 2:58 pm
I'm not a huge fan of locking people up for excruciatingly long periods. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
Cardenas (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 51, 58; see generally People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
Here's a great way to illegally kick Hispanics off your jury, at least if you've got a Hispanic defendant and/or witnesses who will testify in Spanish:Ask all the prospective jurors whether they speak Spanish fluently. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:53 pm
Liberty and Justice for Y'all brings word of an important new case from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (Cardenas v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:34 am
The Los Angeles Daily Journal this week reported a $1 Million jury verdict out of Kern County CA involving an traffic collision between tractor trailer and a passenger automobile (Cardenas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week issued an odd and confusing opinion in a case styled Johnson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:08 pm
See Cardenas, 9 F.3d at 1148 n. 3. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
See People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:07 am
" The two cases are: Cardenas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Cardenas (1982) 31 Cal.3d 897, 904 (prejudicial evidence); People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Mandel and its own decision in Cardenas v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:49 am
See People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:59 am
People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:23 am
§ 3607(a); Cardenas-Uriarte v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:16 pm
look up case number F02-2850, state of fl v. leonardo cardenas. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:56 pm
See United States v. [read post]