Search for: "People v. Carter (1997)" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am by MBettman
On August 30, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Carter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
In the years after the Court of Appeals decision in Stith three of the four Appellate Departments have issued rulings counter to the Stith holding, concluding that because it is the defendant's initial burden to establish standing, the People may raise defendant's lack of standing for the first time on appeal (see People v McCall, 51 AD3d 822, 822 [2d Dept 2008] lv denied 11 NY3d 856 [2008]; People v Hooper, 245 AD2d 1020, 1021 [4th Dept… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm by Danielle Wild
"the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places"This is a classic quote from Katz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:05 am
The recent decision by the supremes in Forest Grove Sch Dist v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:10 am by MBettman
Carter, 124 Ohio App.3d 423 (2d Dist. 1997) (Trial court’s blanket policy of refusing to accept no contest pleas without particularized consideration of the facts of each case is an abuse of discretion.) [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
“On Monday, news washed up that this "famous" sari of the Nobel laureate nun, who died in 1997, has been trademarked to prevent "unfair" use by people for commercial purposes. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
   It ordered an indefinite delay in a habeas case involving Sean Carter, who was sentenced to death for murdering his 68-year-old adoptive grandmother in 1997. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Since John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586 general damages in libel have been limited to a ceiling at that date of £200,000, following a comparison with personal injury damages. [read post]