Search for: "People v. Cavanaugh" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 11:39 am by Paul Horwitz
Galloway have to say to people like Bedrosian or Cavanaugh--and what do incidents like this say about the opinion? [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:14 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
On August 26, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published its opinion in People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:38 am by Jack Chin
  (Here's David Selden of Ballard Spahr The Cavanaugh Law Firm talking about SB1070; he sometimes represents the Chamber of Commerce and looks like an establishment lawyer to me). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
25 May 2007, 5:57 am
As noted here on May 15th, on May 22nd, the Indiana Court of Appeals was scheduled to hear oral argument in David Schlotman v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:08 am by Susan Brenner
  Cavanaugh asked Anderson to interview David Sachs. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by Steven M. Gursten
Justice Young completely ignored the textualist arguments of Justice Cavanaugh, that McCormick v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:13 am
In a harsh dissent, Justice Michael Cavanaugh warned the court it would criminalize a huge class of people. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:33 am by John Jascob
” Clayton added that the SEC’s policy is meant to “restrict people who have done prior wrong from telling people, ‘pay no attention to that. [read post]