Search for: "People v. Chambers" Results 1 - 20 of 1,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by INFORRM
On 29 January 2015, the Grand Chamber held a hearing in the Article 10 case of Perinçek v Switzerland. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
Again, in-chambers stare decisis suggests that at some point Justice Thomas should offer a more extended explanation of how his position on Times v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
There are some darn smart people on the California Supreme Court (and in their chambers).Take today's opinion, for example. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
As Jason Cowart reports in the current issue of The Pomerantz Monitor, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of 2010, Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The incident, in which three people had died and eight others had been injured, had caused much emotion and controversy in Switzerland. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 7:39 am by INFORRM
On 14 September 2016, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held a hearing in the case of Satamedia Oy v  Finland. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
The Center under Julius Chambers filed a brief in the Grutter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm by David Kopel
The Amendment was added by the Irish people in order to prevent the judicial creation of a right to abortion, as in Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
As most people here probably know, the Court heard oral argument last September in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
  Whether this is the case, or whether this was an actual effort to deceive people, I don't see much traction for a free speech defense, which requires at a minimum that the speech in question not be misleading. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
Earlier this month, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down judgment in Mouvement Raelien Suisse v Switzerland (Application no.16354/06). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
Starting this month, over 1.7 million people in Oregon will be sent the first of two checks totaling at least $185. [read post]