Search for: "People v. Chambers" Results 81 - 100 of 2,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am by CMS
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:03 am
  The winning party wins.The only people who are unhappy are the losing sides. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Activist high court, no-fault PPI auto insurance, assignment-of-benefits (AOB) claims helped Florida win top Judicial Hellhole ranking from American Tort Reform Foundation [Amy O’Connor, Insurance Journal] Maybe getting people interested in the age-old ethical dangers of champerty and maintenance would be easier if litigation finance were framed as a Chamber of Commerce vs. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:02 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) The First Department of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court has ruled 5-0 against NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s soda ban, in the case of  In re New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm by Kent Scheidegger
On July 18, I noted that Chief Justice Roberts had issued a stay in Maryland v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
In the first few days of same-sex marriage, marriage licenses were issued to non-residents, and have resulted in decisions such as Chambers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 11:54 am by Rashmi Raman
The Chamber then relies on old jurisprudence from the PCIJ in the Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions and the ICJ’s more recent East Timor (Portugal v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
Does that make us horrible people? [read post]