Search for: "People v. Chambers (1980)"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, including Swann v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
The Center under Julius Chambers filed a brief in the Grutter v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:41 pm
The case is Ramirez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:22 pm
Criden, 633 F2d 346 (3rd Cir 1980); People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
Edwards had also been convicted of shooting to death two people in the 1970s and a 19-year-old couple in 1980. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
Brady v Norman [2011] EWCA Civ 107 – 9 Feb 2011. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm
The book includes Washington cases, such as Washington v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am
The ‘other technique’ of cable retransmission is apparently irrelevant.The CJEU decided in this case without the opinion of the Advocate-General in a small chamber, so maybe it is a slip. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:54 pm
Limitation Nicol J indicated that the claim, brought more than six years after the information was disclosed, would not have been time barred; section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 would have applied. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
[This is a 6k+ word blog post that was joyless to write and most likely will be joyless to read.] [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:23 pm
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Locascia and Others v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 11:17 am
Going back to the 1980s — long before it was popular to focus on diversity in hiring — Justice Breyer has been committed to ensuring that people of all backgrounds come through his chambers. [read post]
