Search for: "People v. Chambers (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
The Center under Julius Chambers filed a brief in the Grutter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by CJLF Staff
  Edwards had also been convicted of shooting to death two people in the 1970s and a 19-year-old couple in 1980. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Chambers, 918 F.2d 1455, 1462 (9th Cir.1990). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am by INFORRM
Brady v Norman [2011] EWCA Civ 107 – 9 Feb 2011. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  In the 1970s and 1980s, this British entrepreneur invented lots of products in the earliest days of the computer age, including the ZX computers in the 1980s:  the ZX80, then the ZX81, then the ZX Spectrum. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
The ‘other technique’ of cable retransmission is apparently irrelevant.The CJEU decided in this case without the opinion of the Advocate-General in a small chamber, so maybe it is a slip. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:57 am by Howard Wasserman
Bank of Boston in 1980, which invalidated a ban on corporate expenditures in an issue election, or, more fundamentally, with Buckley v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Limitation Nicol J indicated that the claim, brought more than six years after the information was disclosed, would not have been time barred; section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 would have applied. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm by Dale Carpenter
Spooked by the repeal drive, the Houston chamber of commerce opposed the ordinances. [read post]