Search for: "People v. Cheeks"
Results 21 - 40
of 232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 1:02 pm
Kentucky, 559 U.S. ___ (2010).Corporations are people too; at least when it comes to the First Amendment and spending money in election campaigns.Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm
[Jezebel] * Are you keeping up with Kirby v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
Wood v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:26 pm
Iran v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:50 pm
Regardless of the fact that there may well be lots of people named "Jose A. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:01 pm
” [Legal Cheek] * If you saw last week’s post on crazy people who claim that no court can try them because of maritime law, check out this epic opinion from Canada. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
Case citation: Wexler v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
” Stewart v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Today, the Supreme Court hears arguments in Marlyand v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:43 pm
Wood v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
By motion, the People move under CPL Sec. 240.20(2)(b)(v) to compel the Defendant to submit to the taking of oral swab samples from his body for DNA testing and analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
Randall Hodgkinson won in State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am
“Driving While Black” is a tongue-in-cheek expression that describes a frightening reality—police can, and often do, find any reason to pull over Black drivers. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Despite evidence that the post had only been viewed by a small number of people and was shortly removed from the site, the Court held that the words complained of constituted a “serious libel and was not one to be construed as some mere tongue in cheek saloon bar banter” as was submitted by the defendant. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 4:35 pm
(Ilya Somin) Most students who take a property law class study the famous New York case of Stambovsky v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:59 pm
I have had the pleasure of meeting people who do daft things after a good shot of coffee. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm
(The case is Golan v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
Virtually every paragraph includes a tongue-in-cheek reference. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
I totally overlooked this case when it came down in August 2015, but it's worth revisiting now because it affects everyone who handles wage and hour cases under the Fair Labor Standards Act.The case is Cheeks v. [read post]
