Search for: "People v. City of Los Angeles" Results 221 - 240 of 677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But if Trump did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Those fans will likely have less to celebrate next season, because Toronto’s star player and now-two-time NBA Finals MVP Kawhi Leonard then signed as a free agent with the Los Angeles Clippers. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by Nossaman LLP
City of Los Angeles, he argued that because the State’s expert did not quantify damages, there was insufficient evidence to survive a directed verdict. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am by Amy Howe
The case arose because companies that provide services at Los Angeles International Airport argue that a labor-peace provision in the agreement that they are required to sign to operate at LAX – which is owned and operated by the city of Los Angeles and Los Angeles World Airports, a component of the city – is pre-empted by federal law. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:44 pm
City of Los Angeles Report of the Appellate Process Task Force Proposed Local Rules People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm by Nathan Sheard
The people of Los Angeles and cities across the country deserve safe streets. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
These include: CBD pain cream An emu oil salve A tea-like drink with CBD CBD infused drinks from breweries, bars, and cafes Vegetable juices Raw fruits Tinctures Edibles Vape oils Sprays Capsules CBD bars CBD gummies Some people are even using these products for their pets. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
In fact, the Supreme Court tackled a closely related issue in case that’s now more than four decades old: Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
City of New London both indicate that the “for public use” portion of the Takings Clause restricts condemnations further than normal due process limits on state police power. [read post]