Search for: "People v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 321 - 340
of 686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
But Los Angeles area residents can't get their weed via delivery. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
The Los Angeles Times writes that “where the government wants reasonable paths into phones and databases for criminal investigations, it is instead being met with stiffer barriers,” with increased support for privacy and encryption spreading throughout Silicon Valley. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:59 am
Uber Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 am
NAM v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 am
” In Chen v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 am
” In Chen v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 am
” In Chen v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
He was a lawyer in the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office for eight years as well as a best-selling author. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 1987) However, the court is not required to accept as true `allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of fact, or unreasonable inferences. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
The only other denied relist was the once-relisted City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
City of Highland Park, 15-133, which originated from the Second (not Second Amendment) City, brought a constitutional challenge to a city ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:55 am
“The justices don’t reveal their reasons for denying review, but one thing is clear,” said Adam Winkler, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
The organizers publicized the event broadly through MySpace and various email lists, and approximately 100 people attended. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 8:26 pm
People v Optimal Global Healing, 2015 WL 6940135 (CA App. 11/5/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Medical Marijuana [read post]
