Search for: "People v. City of Los Angeles" Results 41 - 60 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 10:24 am
First: For anyone who thinks that, in a big city like Los Angeles, there must be pretty good safeguards to make sure that warrants make sense, think again. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:13 pm by Steven M. Sweat
City of Long Beach, BC 559317, that was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court demonstrates the principle of vicarious liability for public employees. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm by Whitney Hodges and Lauren Chang
EO N-4-25 will likely be at odds with recent case law that sets the requirements for analyzing a project’s impacts on evacuation routes and wildfire risk, including People of the State of California ex rel Rob Bonta Attorney General v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
 But Los Angeles area residents can't get their weed via delivery. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:35 pm
  Lying is bad to begin with, but when we know you lie about even small things (like Pokemon Go), I suspect that you might well lie about much bigger things as well.And police officers are far too much in a position of trust to have people there who we know lie about even tiny things.So feel free to play Pokemon Go on your own time, or to not back up other people just because you don't like them (or feel lazy).Just don't be a cop. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 1:07 pm
One way to look at this is to say that there's zero reason to enforce the offer in such settings, since the case is over anyway and letting people do this only discourages settlement since they can wait until after the MSJ hearing to decide whether to accept the offer or not.The other way to look at this is to think that the defendant is being a moron, so gets what it deserves. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm by Jamie Williams
Cities across the U.S. are forcing operators of shared bikes and scooters to use dangerous and privacy invasive APIs developed by the Los Angeles Department of Transportation. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am by Jon Gelman
The case is being litigated on behalf of the People by the County of Santa Clara, the City and County of San Francisco, the County of Alameda, the City of Oakland, the City of San Diego, the County of Los Angeles, the County of Monterey, the County of San Mateo, the County of Solano, and the County of Ventura. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
People v Urziceanu (2005) 132 CA4th 747, 773, 33 CR3d 859. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh - Guest
Eugene Volokh is a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Also filing briefs as Amici Curiae, or friends of the court, in support of Petitioners are the City of Los Angeles and the West Adams for Clear Skies. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:12 pm
I'm sure the entire process has frustrated him, thereby resulting in his overblown (in my mind) rhetoric that he has an absolute right to defend himself by shooting near people -- one which the LAPD can't regulate or even attempt to discipline. [read post]