Search for: "People v. Clark (1969)" Results 21 - 27 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Jackson (1969) (being a sampling of his judicial opinions). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
When the National League announced in November 1967, that it would be adding two additional teams for the 1969 season, Milwaukee applied for one of the franchises, as did groups from Dallas-Ft. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Crouse, 417 F.2d 504 (10th Cir. 1969)..........................................................34, 36 Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
But there was nonetheless a majority, which was guided by an ideological core that (to borrow a phrase from Cass Sunstein's recent essay) had a vision - Brennan and Douglas (throughout); Clark (through 1967); Marshall (replacing Clark); Warren (through 1969); Fortas (1965-69); and Black (through 1971). [read post]