Search for: "People v. Clark (1989)" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
In 1989 Mr M transferred the property to the joint names of himself and Mrs M. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
In 1989 Mr M transferred the property to the joint names of himself and Mrs M. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am by S
This is a quick note on a quite important case concerning duties owed to young people who are over 18 and who should have been, but in fact were not, provided with accommodation under s.20, Children Act 1989 prior to their 18th birthday. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Londono, 148 A.D.2d 753, 539 N.Y.S.2d 484 [2d Dept 1989]; see also People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Oldham Council accommodates HC and her children under the Children Act 1989, s 17. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are a lot of prescription drugs out there that people can also use to get high. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
They can vote and do what they want to do, that group of people. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them.  [read post]