Search for: "People v. Clark (1989)" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are a lot of prescription drugs out there that people can also use to get high. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 2:13 pm
Clark, 194 S.W.3d 324 (Ky. 2006) (relying on United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
They can vote and do what they want to do, that group of people. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:00 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 (1989) (quoting Clark v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am by Colin Miller
Clark, 18 F.3d 1337 (6th Cir. 1994), Jeffrey Mullins, Roger Clark, and others allegedly robbed three banks. [read post]