Search for: "People v. Clark (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2025, 8:12 am by INFORRM
”  The discretion of the court to order cross-examination pre-trial is an exceptional measure, reserved for exceptional situations, and the court must be astute to guard against any attempt by a claimant to “extract by cross-examination under order of the court, material upon which to build his case for the substantive hearing” (Stokoe Partnership Solicitors v Grayson [2021] EWCA Civ 626, citing Yukong Line Ltd of Korea v Rendsburg Investments… [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Clark made a deal with NBC, to run from 1994 or 1996 (depending on whether TBS exercised pending options it held or not) through 1999, plus two additional option periods that together extended through 2005, and possible further renewals thereafter. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Clark, June 18, 2015, 9-0 on the judgment, two dissenting votes on the main issue and one hard to classify vote. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
GEO argues that its broadcasting was protected by reporting privilege under section 15 of the Defamation Act 1996, 5RB reports. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the in camera application, Laffoy J referred to Clarke J’s judgment in Doe v Revenue Commissioners and held the Court has no jurisdiction to hear these civil proceedings otherwise than in public. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]