Search for: "People v. Clayton" Results 1 - 20 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2020, 5:58 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County protects LGBT people from employment discrimination, but not discrimination in housing or public accommodations. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:07 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County, the Supreme Court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination against gay and transgender people. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 5:38 am by James Romoser
Clayton County — which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects LGBTQ workers — is already having broad ramifications in other litigation involving claims of discrimination against transgender people. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County rested on a defective understanding of causation: An employer who discriminates against LGBT people is not motivated by the employee’s sex, but rather by the employee’s sexual orientation. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Howard Friedman
Clayton County, Georgia, (Docket No. 17-1618) (SCOTUSblog Case Page) and consolidated it with Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 6:08 am by SCOTUStalk
Clayton County, the two-minute rule, Justice Kagan’s interpretation of “because of sex” and Justice Gorsuch’s concern about the “massive social upheaval that would be entailed” by deciding that sex discrimination under Title VII covers transgender people. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:23 am by Kalvis Golde
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]