Search for: "People v. Clayton" Results 1 - 20 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2007, 9:56 pm
This post is my third installment about law career issues raised by the movie Michael Clayton. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:05 am
Clayton does not like him, and Barry does not like Clayton. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 7:18 pm
This is my last post about the movie Michael Clayton. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:17 pm
After all, when someone is making a "message" movie, will people go see it if the message is "Gee, this is something you perhaps should think about? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Tracy Thomas
Clayton County on the question of "Whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1)... [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 5:58 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County protects LGBT people from employment discrimination, but not discrimination in housing or public accommodations. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:07 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County, the Supreme Court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination against gay and transgender people. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 5:38 am by James Romoser
Clayton County — which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects LGBTQ workers — is already having broad ramifications in other litigation involving claims of discrimination against transgender people. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Howard Friedman
Clayton County, Georgia, (Docket No. 17-1618) (SCOTUSblog Case Page) and consolidated it with Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 6:08 am by SCOTUStalk
Clayton County, the two-minute rule, Justice Kagan’s interpretation of “because of sex” and Justice Gorsuch’s concern about the “massive social upheaval that would be entailed” by deciding that sex discrimination under Title VII covers transgender people. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:23 am by Kalvis Golde
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]