Search for: "People v. Clifton" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
  Who now gets to hang in prison with some of the people he helped put there. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
 But there are definitely patterns.But then, once in while, the Court of Appeal publishes an opinion that mixes things up a bit.So today's published opinion begins:"After defendant Brady Dee Douglas’s former boyfriend, a male prostitute, told him Jeffrey B. had shorted him money following a prearranged sexual encounter, defendant and codefendant Clifton Sharpe tracked down Jeffrey and demanded the unpaid money. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 5:26 am by Patricia Salkin
Montclair State University v County of Passaic, 2017 WL 3611681 (NJ App. 8/23/2017)  Filed under: Preemption, Uncategorized [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
 And the other two Republican appointees (Judges Kozinski and Clifton) are hardly a prosecutor's dream. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
Private nuisance is established by proof of intentional action or inaction that substantially and unreasonably interferes with other people’s use and enjoyment of their property. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
Private nuisance is established by proof of intentional action or inaction that substantially and unreasonably interferes with other people’s use and enjoyment of their property. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:49 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th (Alarcon joined by Clifton) remanded to a different judge for resentencing. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:55 am
And ones that concern a large number of different people. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:02 pm by John Wright
Hawaii that the Second Amendment of the US Constitution grants people the right to carry firearms in the open. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
 Those arguments surely wouldn't be enough to stop strident opposition to a statute that imposed an analogous burden on "regular" people, but for prisoners, the arguments are persuasive enough.All that said, in the end, I think that Judge Clifton is probably right that there's no compensable taking here. [read post]