Search for: "People v. Cohen (1969)" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:09 pm
"From the WaPo article (by Robert Barnes):In 1969, the Supreme Court famously held in Tinker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
"This is interesting, from Sotomayor's opinion, taking note of Cohen v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:59 am by John Floyd
The Rule was dramatically amended in 1975 in response to the Supreme Court’s 1969 landmark decision in Boykin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
The TTAB heard oral argument on April 24th in Dave Brock v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
(citing Black, 538 U.S. at 359); see also People in the Interest of K.W., 2012 COA 151, ¶ 30 (citing Cohen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
On December 24, 1969, Judge Walter Mansfield, to whom the case had been reassigned, wrote as follows: If the Commission in the present case had denied licenses to all applicants convicted of crimes or military offenses, plaintiff would have no valid basis for demanding that a license be issued to him. [read post]